A fair review
I have played the full version in armorgames and i have quite a few criticism to make, so as to make the game better.
1. The campaign can be very frustrating at times, seems to me that the enemies are able to come in numbers that are thrice of mine own forces size and my troops get RAPED, even Eisenhower, will not be able to command the troops to victory.
2. Another grouse is the flanking system. Whereas it's an improvement from Warfare 1917, where troops just go center, the unrealistic part is that despite outflanking the enemy, i can't win yet, which doesn't make sense at all, since most battles are won where the invaders outflank the defenders.
3. One of the upgrades allows you to train riflemen at a cheaper price, which i feel its pointless since riflemen are already dirt cheap, i feel that the reward should be giving a price discount for assault teams since they are more effective and better than riflemen.
4. Grenades should be a must, since every soldier carries it to battle. Maybe make the assault team lob grenades once in a while?
5. Bazooka teams are quite decent at dealing with tanks, will be better if there are two soldiers carrying bazookas.
6. Air support should also include dropping bombs so that it can deal with tanks as well.
7. I prefer the old mortar system, where you can call in mortar easily, instead of training mortar men.
8. Since WWII has much early urban warfare, why not put alleys between buildings where bazooka teams can fire at tanks effectively instead of hiding behind direct cover where tanks can blast you apart.
9. For the next game: please make a Korean War, since its the most forgotten war in the 20th century.
Other than that, GREAT GAME!